Opening The Rift
© 2026 The Rift. All Rights Reserved.

“The country should be able to provide economic justice to its population while upholding democratic and liberal values.”
The idea of India is enshrined in the Preamble to the constitution, rooted in our independence movement. It is a synthesis of Democracy, Secularism, Socialism and Liberalism aimed at achieving economic justice for its population. The country should be able to provide economic justice to its population while upholding democratic and liberal values.
In 1970, India’s nominal GDP and per capita income were $ 62.4 billion and $ 114 respectively and increased to $ 4.15 trillion and $ 2813 respectively in 2026. Apparently, it looks like a substantial increase in per capita income from year 1970 to 2026 but considering inflation-adjusted purchasing power, it has increased from Rs. 1.6 lakhs to Rs. 2.35 lakhs. This is not a substantial increase in per capita income to lift population out of poverty. Wealth generation has not percolated to the poor population, and the wealthy have cornered a major share, which is reflected in our country’s Gini coefficient, a measure of wealth distribution, of 62., a measure of wealth distribution, of 62 for our country (0 represents equality, 100 represents maximum inequality). India has developed into an unequal society and is not able to provide economic justice to its ordinary citizens.
It is important to compare China, South Korea, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and India’s macro-economic indicators to understand the economic development in all these countries in four decades.
| S. N. | Name of Country | Nominal GDP ($) | Per Capita Income ($) | ||
| 1970 | 2026 | 1970 | 2026 | ||
| 1. | India | 62.4 billion | 4.15 trillion | 114 | 2813 |
| 2. | Pakistan (1970 Undivided figures) | 10.03 billion | 452 billion | 167 | 1901 |
| 3. | Bangladesh | Not Applicable | 510 billion | Not Applicable | 2960 |
| 4. | South Korea | 8.3 billion | 1.93 trillion | 253 | 37142 |
| 5. | China | 92.7 billion | 20.85 trillion | 113 | 14874 |
In 1970, China’s economy and per capita income were comparable to India’s, but China leapfrogged from a poor country to a middle-income country. Similarly, South Korea developed into a higher-income country, which was a poor country in 1970. South Asian countries India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and other SAARC countries could not economically progress and remained poor. countries could not economically progress and remained poor country. Thus, SAARC country leadership must set a singular goal to achieve economic prosperity by 2050 to lift the population from poverty.
The important ingredients for accelerated economic development of a country or region are predictable fiscal policies, rule of law and most importantly peace within the country and in the region. India’s focus shifted to prepare the country for external threats after its debacle with China, and it got busy modernizing its armed forces. Similarly, SAARC region could not develop into a closed economic union due to deteriorating relationships mainly between Pakistan and India. SAARC became a forum for settling political scores rather than economic cooperation among member states for the free movement of goods and services. It is ironical that SAARC population is 1.9 billion (24% of world population) with per capita income of $ 3000 and is one of poorest regions in world.
SAARC forum must prioritize its goals, giving economic cooperation foremost importance so that the region can achieve substantial macro-economic goals essential for lifting its population out of poverty. India and Pakistan are major players in SAARC forum and their cooperation can be the lynchpin for economic development of the region. The rationales for India-Pakistan dialogue and co-operation are as follows:
In conclusion, SAARC regional economic block can pave the way for the economic upliftment of the population of South Asia. Every country in the region must understand that countries in the region don’t progress in isolation, since any failed country in the region will have a spillover effect on the other countries. Thus, it is important that civil society must put pressure on respective governments to improve relations with their neighbors for the development of the region as a whole.
Disclaimer:The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Rift.



