Sanjeev Sirohi

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has ruled that authorities must give social media users a copy of any notice they send to a platform to block their content.

Mere presence at a protest venue beyond permitted hours does not constitute an offence without specific allegations of disobedience or common intention.

Denying West UP even a single High Court Bench is the “worst travesty of justice” and a “national disgrace.”

Allahabad HC Directs All Judicial Officers In UP Issuing Statewide Directions To Pass Speaking And Reasoned Orders While Exercising Jurisdiction Under Sections 173(4), 175(3) And 175(4) Of BNSS, 2023

Organisations engaged in religious conversion shall be denied registration under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA).

Denying West UP even a single High Court Bench is the “worst travesty of justice,” putting litigants’ lives on the dock for no fault of their own.

The constitutional provision enabling the appointment of distinguished jurists as Supreme Court Judges has remained unused for over 76 years.

Courts must refrain from imposing personal views or value judgments on morality while adjudicating bail matters or criminal trials.

The Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960, fines are so low, there is almost no fear of the law, leading to abuse for social media views.

The Supreme Court held that preventive detention was used punitively to subvert judicial bail orders, quashing the NSA detention and imposing costs.

For 80 years, West UP, with over 10 crore people, has been denied a High Court Bench, facing ‘worst travesty of justice’ and ‘blatant discrimination’ despite overwhelming need.

The Allahabad High Court questioned if restrictions could be imposed on private worship, emphasizing religious equality and the State’s duty to ensure rule of law.

Denying West UP a High Court Bench is the “worst travesty of justice,” a blatant violation of Article 14, and a deep burial of equality.

The Allahabad High Court unequivocally held that Kamlesh Kumar was kept in illegal police custody, ordering his immediate release and compensation.

The Supreme Court declares an arrest illegal if grounds are not furnished in writing, mandating judicial oversight and police accountability for constitutional breaches.

This will undoubtedly check the most blatant misuse of penal laws and so also ensure that innocents are not framed without any prima facie reason which is the crying need of the hour also!

A Delhi High Court order initiated contempt proceedings against a Tihar Jail Superintendent for frustrating a parole order, violating an undertrial’s constitutional rights.

The Allahabad High Court has unequivocally held that the Uttar Pradesh Government continuously uses the Goonda Act as a tool of oppression, despite courts regularly highlighting its misuse.

A promise of marriage may not amount to deceitful sexual intercourse when both parties are already married and aware of each other’s marital status.

Arrest is not the inevitable companion of investigation; the power to arrest is not a license to arrest.

The Allahabad High Court denied bail to Maulana Tauqeer Raza Khan, sending a clear message against provocative slogans challenging India’s sovereignty.

The Uttarakhand High Court cautions against the casual invocation of Section 306 IPC, stating that mere refusal to marry does not amount to abetment of suicide.

The Delhi High Court held that a DNA report only proves sexual intercourse, not consent, and the benefit of doubt must go to the accused.

“If court themselves and their processes turn into sites of oppression, it will undermine the faith of the people in the justice system.”