The Rift Team

The Party Announces “Green Alliance”, Nationwide Grassroots Expansion, and Upcoming Ladakh Padyatra.

The Uttar Pradesh Anti-Conversion Law is creating a chilling effect on religious freedom, leading to alleged victimisation and constitutional concerns.

48 prominent academics and eminent citizens demand that the University be allowed to continue functioning in its present state so that the education of thousands of students is not compromised.

“Modi Government Must Stop Anti-Farmer Policies and Accept the Just Demands of India’s Annadatas” Socialist Party (India)

The latest provisional UDISE+ 2025–26 data exposes an institutional massacre of primary and upper primary schools, stripping the poorest children of India of their fundamental right to learn.

The government’s rush to demolish clearly reflects the politically motivated nature of the whole process, disguised as routine institutional functioning.

“We Demand His Immediate Release and Removal of Union Education Minister.” Socialist Party (I)

“Socialist Party (India) wholeheartedly supports your proposed protest on 20 July, 2026 at Jantar Mantar, Delhi to demand restoration of full statehood for Jammu and Kashmir.”

“We support the call for the immediate resignation of the Union Education Minister, Shri Dharmendra Pradhan.”

“Parvez’s situation yet again highlights how the UAPA has been persistently deployed by the Indian government to silence political activists, human rights defenders, and dissidents”

A massive blaze in a Kolkata government building has destroyed thousands of voting machines, prompting a police investigation and raising questions about post-election deliberate sabotage.

By strictly applying Article 329(b) to dismiss Meenakshi Natarajan’s petition, the Supreme Court has reaffirmed that once an election begins, the bureaucracy holds absolute, unreviewable power.

Twenty of the Trinamool Congress’s twenty-eight Lok Sabha MPs have formally offered support to the BJP-led National Democratic Alliance, altering the balance of power in Parliament.

The strategic deletion of a single restrictive clause transformed India’s ₹20,000 crore grain storage modernisation into a consolidated corporate enterprise.

The organization equated the current crackdown on democratic expression to the repressive atmosphere of the 1975 Emergency.

While recent murmurs from the bench reaffirm that bail is the rule, the refusal to dismantle the statutory embargo leaves personal liberty at the mercy of a judicial lottery.

A single courtroom insult by the Chief Justice of India on May 15, 2026, spawned a satirical political movement that surpassed the ruling BJP’s Instagram following within five days, attracted over 350,000 registered members, and drew international coverage from Forbes to Al Jazeera.

Whether this survives the next election is an entirely different question, and one that the Supreme Court of India, by its silence, has made sure only politics can answer.

The NEET-UG paper has leaked again. Two years after Parliament passed a law specifically to prevent this, the exact same thing happened. With 22.8 lakh students affected, a cancelled exam, and a CBI probe that feels like it runs on a yearly subscription.

With Gaza’s death toll now verified to have exceeded 75,000, the erasure of the West Bank continues in the shadow of a regional war that serves as both a screen and a justification.

The Cabinet just cleared a bill to increase the Supreme Court’s bench strength to tackle the judicial backlog. But treating a broken justice system like a corporate staffing shortage ignores the real culprit.

Articles 164(1) and 172(1) work in powerful tandem to ensure that absolutely no state government can outlive its democratic mandate by even a single day.

The 2026 assembly results have redrawn India’s political map. The BJP stormed Bengal and held Assam, the UDF swept Kerala, and Vijay’s TVK stunned Tamil Nadu. But the opposition says the biggest story is who was not allowed to vote.

Today, on May 5, the Supreme Court opens final arguments on 240 petitions against the Citizenship Amendment Act. The government has spent six years making the law a fact on the ground. The court must now decide if it is also a fact of the Constitution.