Opening The Rift
© 2026 The Rift. All Rights Reserved.

In 2025, a chocolate bar filled with pistachio cream and crunchy pastry became an international sensation after videos of people breaking it open and tasting it spread across social media. The Dubai chocolate craze soon extended beyond the original product, inspiring variations in croissants, milkshakes and other desserts. The Associated Press reported that the trend also contributed to rising demand for pistachios.
The episode illustrates how quickly an online fascination can move into physical shops, influence what people want to try and create opportunities for businesses. A product can gain cultural significance before most potential buyers have encountered it in person.
Consumer culture has always been shaped by advertising, celebrity endorsements and social influence. Digital platforms have changed the speed and scale of that process. Recommendations, entertainment, personal identity and shopping now often occupy the same screen, making it harder to distinguish an independent interest from a desire encouraged by repeated exposure.
For consumers in India and elsewhere, the question is increasingly important: how much of what we buy reflects our own priorities, and how much is shaped by the digital environments in which we spend our time?
A person might open a social media application to watch a comedy video, follow a friend or learn a new recipe. During the same session, they may encounter a creator recommending skincare, a video demonstrating a kitchen appliance or a post promoting a clothing brand.
The transition from entertainment to commerce is often subtle. A creator demonstrates a product, viewers discuss it in the comments, other users share their experiences, and a purchase link appears nearby. The recommendation feels like part of an ordinary conversation, even when a commercial relationship influences the content.
Evidence from India reflects this convergence. A 2026 Meta-RAI study, published by Meta in collaboration with the Retailers Association of India, reported that 77% of retail brand and product discovery happened through social media, with Meta’s platforms accounting for 96% of that discovery within the study’s findings.
Meta has a commercial interest in social advertising, so its research should be interpreted in that context. Even with that qualification, the findings point to an important change in how products reach potential buyers. Discovery increasingly happens while people are doing something other than deliberately shopping.
This changes the relationship between advertising and everyday life. A product recommendation may appear between personal updates, travel videos and discussions about popular culture. Commercial messages become part of the social environment rather than remaining separate from it.
Digital trends generally move through a recognisable sequence. The details differ, but four processes can help explain how a passing interest becomes a buying decision.
These stages can overlap or occur in a different order. Someone might first hear about a product from a friend and later encounter it in a recommendation feed. The important point is that repeated exposure and visible participation can make an item feel more relevant than it initially seemed.
Different forms of online content influence decisions in different ways. Recognising the distinction can help consumers assess what they are seeing rather than reacting to every recommendation in the same way.
| Online cue | How it can influence behaviour | What consumers should check |
| Creator recommendation | Builds familiarity and may transfer trust from the creator to the product | Whether the content is sponsored and whether independent reviews support the claims |
| Viral product video | Makes an unfamiliar product appear desirable or culturally relevant | Product quality, price, usefulness and alternatives |
| Countdown or limited-stock message | Creates urgency and reduces time for comparison | Whether the deadline or scarcity claim is genuine |
| Personalised recommendations | Repeatedly presents products related to earlier interests | Whether the recommendation meets an actual need or merely reflects previous browsing |
These mechanisms are not inherently harmful. A useful demonstration can help someone evaluate a product, while a recommendation from a knowledgeable creator may save time. Problems emerge when popularity substitutes for evidence, commercial incentives remain hidden or artificial urgency discourages informed decisions.
Products can carry meaning beyond their practical functions. Clothing can communicate personal style, food choices can express cultural interests, and particular devices can signal membership in a professional or social group.
Online communities give these signals greater visibility. People discover new aesthetics, participate in shared interests and adapt ideas from communities outside their immediate surroundings. A person interested in fitness, for example, may find useful advice and encouragement from people with similar goals.
The difficulty arises when inspiration becomes an expectation. Repeated exposure to idealised lifestyles can create pressure to purchase the products associated with them. Someone may begin to feel that a particular skincare routine, wardrobe or collection of gadgets is necessary to maintain a desired appearance or social identity.
This is particularly evident in fast-moving categories such as fashion, beauty and consumer electronics. Trends change quickly, while social platforms make it easy to observe what others are wearing, using or recommending.
The underlying behaviour predates social media. People have long used possessions to express identity and seek social acceptance. Digital platforms intensify the process by making trends more visible, providing immediate feedback and allowing new styles to spread rapidly.
The result is a complicated relationship between expression and consumption. Buying something can genuinely reflect personal interest, yet repeated exposure can also shape what a person comes to regard as desirable.
Consumer choices have economic consequences for brands, retailers, creators and digital platforms. The larger the pool of people shopping online, the more valuable product discovery becomes to businesses seeking their attention.
Markntel Advisor’s e-commerce research estimates that the global business-to-consumer e-commerce market will reach USD 8.41 trillion in 2026 and USD 12.65 trillion by 2032. Its analysis also identifies fashion and apparel as approximately 24% of the market’s application mix in 2026.
These are market estimates and forecasts, not proof that social media causes people to buy particular products. They do, however, provide context for the commercial importance of digital retail and the categories in which online discovery can influence demand.
Fashion offers a useful example because social content can demonstrate how an item looks, show different ways to wear it and connect it to a wider aesthetic. A creator’s video can generate interest, while retailer links and targeted recommendations provide a convenient path to purchase.
The commercial incentives extend beyond traditional advertisements. Creators may earn commissions through affiliate links, receive products from brands or publish sponsored content. Platforms earn revenue from advertising and benefit when users remain engaged. Retailers, meanwhile, compete to turn attention into sales.
These interests can overlap with consumers’ needs, but they are not identical. A recommendation designed to increase sales does not necessarily identify the best product for an individual or account for their financial circumstances.
Online shopping has removed many barriers between considering a product and buying it. Saved addresses, digital payments, personalised offers and rapid delivery can make purchases easier, especially for people with limited access to physical shops.
Convenience has clear benefits. It allows consumers to compare products, access specialist goods and save time. The concern is that a shorter path to purchase can also leave less room for reflection.
A person who encounters a product during a late-night scroll may be able to buy it within seconds. A limited-time offer or a claim that an item is nearly sold out can make waiting seem risky. When several small purchases follow, the total spending may become more significant than any individual transaction.
Interface design can influence the process as well. Some websites and applications use patterns that obscure costs, push users towards particular choices or make it difficult to decline an offer.
India’s consumer-protection framework addresses these practices through the Central Consumer Protection Authority’s dark-pattern guidelines. The guidelines identify practices such as false urgency, disguised advertisements, hidden charges and the automatic addition of items or services to a basket.
Enforcement has also produced concrete examples. In June 2026, the government reported action against PhysicsWallah and McAfee over dark-pattern practices. In PhysicsWallah’s case, the authority identified a preselected ₹10 donation during checkout and conditions requiring personal information to access courses advertised as free.
The example shows why informed choice depends on more than individual willpower. Consumers need clear pricing, transparent terms and interfaces that allow them to accept or decline an offer without deception or pressure.
A balanced view of digital consumer culture must also account for its benefits. Social platforms allow small businesses to find customers beyond their immediate neighbourhoods, independent designers to reach wider audiences and consumers to discover products that may be unavailable locally.
Online communities can introduce people to regional products, specialised interests and alternative ways of living. User reviews and detailed demonstrations can help buyers compare options before spending money. Creators can also challenge misleading claims and explain why a popular product may not be suitable for everyone.
These opportunities matter in India, where consumers differ widely in income, location, language and access to physical retail. A trend that appeals to an urban audience with substantial disposable income may have little relevance elsewhere.
Digital participation does not produce identical preferences. People adapt online ideas to local customs, personal circumstances and financial priorities. Some embrace a trend, others modify it, and many choose not to participate.
The central question is whether platforms expand people’s ability to make informed decisions or encourage them to feel that participation requires constant consumption. Both outcomes can occur within the same digital environment.
Consumers cannot control every recommendation they encounter, but they can create some distance between seeing a product and deciding to buy it.
Platforms and retailers also have responsibilities. Clear advertising disclosures, transparent pricing, accessible privacy controls and straightforward purchasing and cancellation processes can support informed decisions.
The responsibility should not fall entirely on individuals to resist digital environments designed to capture attention and encourage transactions. Better disclosure and fair interface design can make it easier for consumers to understand their options and act according to their own priorities.
Online trends have become part of everyday cultural life. They help people discover ideas, find communities and explore new products. They can also create pressure to keep pace with changing tastes and standards of social belonging.
The issue is not that people are influenced by others. Social influence has always shaped what societies value and what individuals buy. The difference is the speed, scale and personalisation with which digital platforms deliver that influence, often within spaces where entertainment, personal expression and advertising overlap.
A more thoughtful consumer culture does not require people to abandon social media or reject every popular product. It requires room for independent judgement, transparent commercial relationships and the freedom to participate in a trend without feeling compelled to purchase its symbols.
Digital platforms can broaden the range of choices available to people. Whether those choices translate into greater consumer freedom depends on how clearly information is presented, how fairly products are promoted and whether individuals have the space to decide what genuinely belongs in their lives.
Disclaimer:The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Rift.



